Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)

Actually, I'd give ****1/2 stars.

Great movie. I don't why but this is a prequel for some reason. It's not like Star Wars, It is not a series of prequels it's just a one movie deal. It takes place in 1935, one year before the first one took place. Well, I knew this wouldn't be as good as Raiders of the Lost Ark, but that's not to say that it's bad, it's amazing. I heard reviews saying it was racist but no, it's not. It is a good sequel or prequel, so see Raiders and see this any time soon. August 1, 2008

Racist

I saw this when it came out (I was a young adult.) As someone from a hindu family (I am an atheist), I was revolted by the overt insulting nature of this film towards Indians and Hindus.

In the first movie, they treated the whole story behind the arc with respect. Not so with Hinduism.

Utter drivel. June 16, 2008

Easily the worst of the series but quite good.

A year before the events of "Raiders of The Lost Ark", Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) is in Shanghai enjoying an evening of entertainment and making a deal with a ruthless gang of Chinese mobsters for a ancient Chinese artifact. But after a bad deal, he escapes on a plane from Shanghai with spoiled nightclub singer Willie (Kate Chapshaw) and 11 year old Chinese boy ShortRound (Ke Hu Quan)as later they crash land in the Himalayas and find themselves stranded in the jungles. Only until they discover a village where the children of the village has been taken including sacred stones by a cult, it's up to Indy and his two new companions to head to the palace of a young prince where beneath it an evil cult called Thugees and their warlock master Mola Ram (Amrish Puri) has captured the children of the village into slaves and Indy must save them.

Considered the black sheep of the franchise, this entertaining and quite dark installment is underrated by fans of the first and third movies. Steven Spielburg directs once again and George Lucas produced and made the film's storyline, this movie is often scorned by fans because of Kate Capshaw with her complaining & screaming and of course ShortRound. Well i disagree on the ShortRound character cause he did provided some laughs and i agree that Kate Capshaw's character was a pain in the butt, the film did had good atmosphere with some memorable action sequences like the mine cart chase. There's a sense of creepiness through the film like the memorable bug area, some dark humor like the disgusting feast sequence and the gory but effective moments like the infamous heart ripping sequence that caused the MPAA to create the "PG-13" rating in 1984. Despite some flaws, the movie is a gritty and exciting but it's not as good as "Raiders" or "Last Crusade" nor as fun as "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" but it's not as bad as some fans proclaimed.

This DVD has excellent picture and sound quality from THX with some goodies like an introduction by Steven Spielburg and George Lucas, two featurettes, Storyboard sequence, photo galleries and interactive DVD-Rom Lego Indiana Jones game demo.

June 12, 2008

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom - Review

The explosive (and not entirely unexpected) success of Raiders of the Lost Ark ensured that the movie-going public would meet Indiana Jones again. And, indeed, as soon as Harrison Ford removed the mantle of Han Solo for the final time, he once again donned the fedora. It's understandable that George Lucas and Steven Spielberg had difficulty re-creating the fun and nonstop action of the first Indy movie. Even though Raiders was descended from a long line of movie house serials, the 1981 movie had represented an introduction to a new generation; to them, it was fresh and new. The Temple of Doom did not have that benefit. It had to stand or fall on its own merits and it did a little of both.

The famous "heart removal" scene became the impetus for the creation of the PG-13 rating. In trying to take their character and his adventures in a direction that would not copy Raiders, Lucas and Spielberg leeched a lot of the fun out of Indy. Torture. Child abuse. Hearts ripped out. Black magic. It was all a little too much. And the inclusion of ill-placed sequences of physical comedy didn't lighten the tone so much as make the movie occasionally feel schizophrenic.

The idea to make The Temple of Doom a prequel was also a mistake. One of the assets of Raiders was the way in which the characters interacted, especially Indy and Marion (Karen Allen), and Indy and Sallah (John Rhys-Davies). These relationships formed the backbone of Raiders. Yes, audiences flocked to theaters to see the action but it was their fondness for the characters that enriched the experience. The chemistry between Ford and Allen crackled; these characters were made for each other. So what happened with The Temple of Doom? Gone are Marion and Sallah. In their places: Willie Scott (Kate Capshaw) and Short Round (Ke Huy Quan). With all apologies to Ms. Capshaw, who obviously appealed strongly to the director, she's no Karen Allen. Any chemistry between her and Ford is accidental and incidental. As a love interest, she's a bust. Her role is therefore to scream a lot, get into trouble from which she needs to be rescued, and annoy the hell out of viewers who are tired of this sort of comedic damsel in distress act. It might be acceptable if it was more amusing and less tedious. On the other hand, Short Round seemed like the ideal child sidekick to Indy. The small Chinese boy with the Yankees cap really added a lot to the film by means of his friendship to Indy.

The cliffhanger-tinged action that made the first movie so appealing has been toned down. There's an extended sequence at the opening and another one at the end but, excepting a scene involving bugs and spikes, there's not much in the middle. That's not to say that The Temple of Doom is boring but it lacks the momentum that drove the first movie from its opening scene to its closing moment. In terms of all-time Indiana Jones stunts, I'd stack the plane escape (near the beginning) and the mine car chase (near the end) against anything else Lucas and Spielberg have put on film. It's too bad there weren't more moments like this. Raiders has so many it's difficult to single them out. The Temple of Doom is more selective and not the better for it.

The Temple of Doom opens in 1935 Shanghai, with archeologist adventurer Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) in trouble with a local crime lord. As is his style, Indy has to make a daredevil's escape - this time in the company of his pint-sized sidekick, Short Round, and a nightclub singer, Willie Scott. Eventually, after a series of improbable close calls, this trio ends up in India, where they are implored by the leaders of a small village to retrieve a stolen magic stone. More because he senses a chance for fame and fortune than because he cares about the villagers, Indy agrees. This results in a journey that takes him into a majestic palace with a dark secret. Members of the rulership are involved in the Thugee cult, and their plans are to use dark magic to accomplish world domination. Dr. Jones ends up being the "fly in the ointment" (to quote another '80s action movie).

Parents and their offspring alike were startled by what Spielberg revealed in the depths of the title location. Children shackled and force to work under threat of being whipped. Indiana drugged and homicidal. Brutal physical punishment - far more graphic than in the first feature. The setting is one of fire and brimstone, reminiscent of one of Dante's levels of hell. Lucas has been quoted as saying that as he had made The Empire Strikes Back darker than Star Wars, so he wanted to make The Temple of Doom darker than Raiders. He achieved the goal, but few would argue that The Temple of Doom is anywhere close to being as successful as Empire.

There is something to be said of the grimmer tone and the fact that The Temple of Doom doesn't feel like a retread of Raiders. As I mentioned earlier, it's not the darker turn that makes The Temple of Doom uncomfortable at times; it's its mean-spiritedness. Some of the scenes of torture go too far, especially for PG movie. We come to an Indiana Jones movie to have fun; some of what goes on here is anything but that. It's tough to say which is more out-of-place: the awful slapstick act of Willie as she avoids animals while camping outside or the scene in which the villainous Mola Ram (Amrish Puri) plunges his hand into a victim's chest and rips out his heart, then holds it up so everyone can see it beating. The moment has become as iconic as the chestburster scene in Alien, but perhaps not for the right reasons. It sent countless parents storming from theaters with their horrified children in tow.

Ultimately, though, this is only one of several problems to plague The Temple of Doom. It could easily have survived the darkness had the rest of the film been on firm ground. But Indy's companions are weak; we don't identify with them the way we did with Marion and Sallah. There's less action and more overt comedy, and neither change works to the benefit of the story. Raiders managed the perfect blend of both; The Temple of Doom loses the recipe. Still, when all is said and done, this remains an Indiana Jones adventure, and Harrison Ford is as perfect in the role the second time as he was the first. He's the ideal mix of heroism and self-interest; machismo and practicality; roughness and culture. He can be James Bond or Han Solo or Sam Spade. Whatever else The Temple of Doom may lack, it's got Indy, and that's more than a little benefit.

By my reckoning, Raiders of the Lost Ark is a nearly perfect film. There was no way The Temple of Doom could have equaled it. Even all these years later, a pall hangs over it - a whiff not necessarily of failure but of expectations missed.

June 8, 2008

A worthy sequel

INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM sometimes gets a rough ride, but this is undeserved. TEMPLE OF DOOM is a rollicking thrill ride with terrific set pieces and an exotic sense of adventure, and is pure serial adventure. Wonderful fun. June 5, 2008

More reviews at Amazon.com ...